A note about ritual murders of babies and how these Jews use the babies' blood

Printed by the order of the Minister of Domestic Affairs 1844

Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, Author of Russia's famous Dal Living Dictionary of Russian Language

[Transl: this is a unique book and represents one of the best researched studies on this subject. It does not deal with theories, concepts or rumors, but with hard facts and evidence immaculately researched and presented in the most concise way.

Furthermore, this book was not translated into English until very recently and that translation is not quite correct as it was done by a person, whose native language is not English.

This translation here is much more accurate, to the point that it can be cited with confidence that it correctly represents the issues and event as described in the original Russian version.

Nevertheless, all the facts, cases and events described in this book exactly align with what is known from the recent cases described by western authors, most of whom were not even aware of this book when they wrote theirs.

This means that these are the independent sources that, nevertheless, point out to exactly the same ritual using exactly the same methods and with exact same end results.

Therefore, the whole body of evidence is reinforced many times over considering the fact that this book was written nearly two hundred years ago and is not generally known in the West.

FOREWORD

After V.I. Dal's introduction and review of literature on the question about the usage of Christian blood by Jews (pages 1-40), he passes to the “counting of occurred cases of villainous mutilation by Jews and to the examination of the most important cases, or, at least, the most memorable cases to us because of them being reliable--taken from real court cases, with some information obtained from different books written about this subject (see pages 40-86).

In chronological order, he informs the reader of many such events, tracing them back as early as the IV century and continuing onward:

In the IV century, there was at least 1 recorded case,

In total, he mentions 134 cases. Then, he passes to an examination of the Velizh case, one of the more famous cases in Russia:

“For positive confirmation that an accusation of Jewish ritual murder is not simply slander or fiction, and that not one torture of the Middle Ages extorted from Jews this horrible acknowledgement, it is necessary to examine in more detail one of the better-known and well-documented cases of such. For example, the Velizh case was started on April 24, 1823 by the Velizh city police, and finished on January 18, 1835, a 12-year investigation in common meeting of State Council.”

The examination of this case occupies almost 60 pages of this book in its original format. On the last few pages, V.I. Dal concludes:

“I examined the entire number of horrible events, which are proved judiciously throughout history. The accusation that Jews painfully murder Christian babies around Easter time is impossible to discount as if a mere ghost story and superstition, and it is necessary to be convinced that this accusation is indeed reasonable.

There is a common opinion as to the Jews' usage of these martyrs' blood for some type of mysterious magical rites....

Of course, no intelligent person will dispute that in countries where Jews are tolerated, from time to time, the corpses of babies were discovered - almost always found in the same distorted condition or, at the least, showing that they suffered a similar violent death....

It is not just murder but, rather, the premeditated painful torture of innocent babies, committed by those who enjoy these torments for the special reasons associated with them....

From whence are these corpses of innocent children, intentionally distorted in the same manner? Why are these corpses only discovered in areas where the Jews reside? And, finally, why do these cases, almost exclusively, occur around Easter time?

The religious ceremony that results in mutilation does not occur among all Jews but, rather, without any doubt, only among the smallest portion of them:

It exists only in the sect of the Hasidic Jews, a sect with the most persistent fanaticism, who acknowledge only Talmudic and Rabbinical books and renounce the Old Testament; but this is their big secret, perhaps, since not all of their brethren know about it and, of course, not all of the Hasidic Jews participate in it.

“There is not, however, any doubt that it has occurred since the time of Christianity spreading. And, from time to time, Jewish fanatics and cabalistic wizards appear who, having this double purpose, engage in the painful killing of a Christian baby and use his blood for mystical and religious purposes in an effort to create magic.

Since the Middle Ages, Poland and our western provinces served as shelter for this inveterate and ignorant Jewish society; and now those areas represent the largest number of examples of such mutilations, especially the Vitebsk province where the Hasidic sect has significantly spread.”


V.I. Dal's “Searching” is reprinted below according to the copy of V.M.Ostroglazov's collection; moreover, in the remarks, the discrepancies with second edition of it - “ Information” of Scripitsin - are noted.


BACKGROUND

This translation was done with the intent to keep Vladimir Ivanovich Dal's original work as close to the original as possible. Due to the differences in grammatical structure between English and Russian, some small changes were made. This was to make the reading more fluid. While a word-for-word translation would be possible (and quite easy), it would make little sense to the reader. For instance, in Russian, one could say, “I him understand”

(“Я его понимаю”).

While one may be able to easily grasp the meaning in such a simple sentence — ”I understand him” — as the sentences become more complex, it would be near impossible to discern what the writer means. Therefore, each sentence was analyzed to determine the writer's thoughts, with an effort to keep the translation as fluid and understandable as possible.

It should be pointed out that, in particular, I have made one major change throughout this book. The original title was “ Searching for the Jews who Murder Christian Babies, and How the Jews Use the Babies' Blood.” “Christian” was substituted with the term “Christian” throughout this book.

This was done not to discount the alleged incidents that Jews perpetrated against those who profess the Christian faith. Indeed, in many cases, nothing but religious fanaticism exhibited by Jews can probably be attributed to some of these murders, such as that of Father Thomas, who suffered a cruel and horrible fate in 1840 (and, while hardly a baby, was mentioned nonetheless by Dal).

In addition, some of the alleged Jewish mutilation-murders seem demonstrative of an animosity towards Christianity, suggested by the wounds to the hands and feet of the victims.

(Some believe that the children were mutilated in such manners to remind Christians of how Jews led to the crucifying of Jesus Christ.)

In any event, this substitution of words was done not to discount such acts. Rather, it was done because, at the time that this book was written, nearly all people in Russia (aside from the Jews, of course) were Christian. So, all the victims were obviously non-Jewish.

And, while many of these ritualistic crimes may have been committed out of animosity towards Christianity, one cannot say with certainty that these crimes would not have been committed if the babies of people who profess the Christian faith were not available, as it certainly appears that such mystical acts required the use of blood.

Further, such accusations have preceded Christianity itself. One is reminded of the tales surrounding Moloch, a large bronze statue named after the Hebrew King Melech (technically, the same name, since Hebrew has no vowels, “MLK”), in which children were regularly sacrificed by being tossed into a flaming pit called a “Tophet” that surrounded the idol, in the Old Testament.

Also, there have been many accusations in the Arab world of Moslem children suffering a similar fate as that of Christian children (including one rather recently, which will be considered in greater detail later).

And, as with many of the cases mentioned in Dal's book, one cannot discount them. it is for these reasons that the term Christian is used. the rest of the text, unless otherwise noted, remains Dal's:

Shocking interview with Rabbi Abe Finkelstein about Jewish control of the world

[Note: this chapter is not a part of the original document. It was added for informational purposes.]

This could be the most mind shattering thing you have ever heard of. If this won't blow your mind, nothing will, or you don't have anything to blow, just as ZioNazis openly state it about "goyim" - non-"Jews".

An audio recording of an interview with Chabad Lubavich Rabbi Finkelstein outlining the doctrine of ZioNazis and their "father", Lucifer.

According to Finkelstein, you are nothing but a cattle to be slaughtered and sacrificed to their "god", Lucifer, and milked by "god chosen people" for all you have as long as you last.

This is an outline of what they call the "NWO" nowadays - a ZioNazi Luciferian doctrine of world domination and world takeover. The authority with which rabbi Finkelstein speaks is quite something indeed. He speaks as though he knows it all in and out, down to the last dot and comma.

Basically, it outlines their entire doctrine of evil most profound, world domination, parasitism unlimited, wars and revolutions, puppet governments and how they are controlled, ritual sacrifice of hundreds of thousand of children each year and the rest of it. This is pretty much their entire doctrine. Nothing much to be added to it. And it is pronounced clearly by someone of ultimate authority, pretty much clear on its face value.

Finkelstein is quite casual in this interview and tells it all bluntly, in a semi-humorous manner how "goyim" (non-Jews) are being exploited and destroy each other during all the wars and revolutions staged and managed by "god chosen people".

"Rabbi Finkelstein amazingly gives honest answers about world Jewry's control of banking, media and governments, their creation of communism, their founding of the Jesuits, their holocaust hoax, their human sacrifice rituals and many more jaw-dropping subjects. I find the only things more shocking than Rabbi Finkelstein's blunt admissions are his complete callous disregard and playful disdain for us lowly "goyim." What do you guys think of this?"

Research on the murder of Christian children by Jews and drinking their blood

INTRODUCTION

All the civilizations where the Jews reside, for many centuries, have held the popular belief or legend that the Jews have killed non-Jewish babies in a brutal manner, because Jews need the blood of non-Jews for their mysterious ceremonies.

Only recently, people have started to reject these accusations and suggest that, in Europe, they are both absurd fairy-tales and slander. The accusations that Jews commit such acts were horrible if unfounded, of course; however, there are other examples in the chronicles of religious human mutilation: The Indian idol admirers sacrifice themselves and other people by terrible torments, with the hope of acquiring future goods [1] - oftentimes, for the purpose saving a soul. In Europe, among the Christians, a sect of assassins had appeared, and during two or three centuries, the inquisition fires continued. [2]

Also, in Russia, during the last century, the self-incendiaries - that is, people who set themselves afire - appeared. But not only did they burn themselves; they began to set others afire as well, including entire villages. There are these and other religious sects, who commit such acts in an effort to save their souls.

It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of committing such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times of that in court by a variety of people.

On the whole, there was not only their own confession in addition to other evidence; but there were such examples where the Jews were exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being true.

One such event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real existence of such villainous human mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say something quite different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore, proves nothing.

Assuming, however, this argument is true, too, and believing all that was ever said and written on this problem in favor of Jews, with respect to forced confessions, there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is never paid enough attention.

This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews but also is the proof of the crime itself - namely, it is not doubtful that, from time to time, the corpses of babies, who were missing, were eventually discovered in such distorted conditions and with such signs of external violence that they attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths.

This is the kind of murder for which the Jews are accused.

Also, the incidents of this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews live [3].

We must ask ourselves: In what type of circumstance can we attribute the renewed cases of babies who suffered painful deaths - babies who were carefully tortured up to the point of their tragic deaths - if an accusation is not fair? [4]

What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a baby, if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external signs on corpses indicate each time this is discovered, positively, that the death could not be accidental in any case but intentional.

And, it is obvious that these injuries sustained by the babies are deliberately done and take place over a long time: The whole body is poked or pricked. Then, scraps of skin are cut. The tongue was often cut out.

The intimate parts of boys are either cut out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally, other parts of the body are cut out, and the palms are punctured. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put on and removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has abrasions as if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it.

Sometimes, the corpse was even washed, with it being discovered without any blood in it; nor was there any blood on the undergarments or clothes, demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and, afterwards, put on again.

The parents and siblings of babies who have experienced such tragic deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people commit such deplorable acts to innocent babies?

Without a purpose, it could never be done; yet it continues to happen repeatedly over time. The ordinary killer, in any case, would be satisfied with one murder. But a murderer who kills for some type of mysterious, important purpose cannot be rejected here.

The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of Jews, their impudent and stubborn denial, not infrequently a bribery, the confidence by the majority of educated people in that an accusation is merely the infamous slander and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws - all these things saved the Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from deserved execution.

But they - by using their machinations, by giving false oath assurances of innocence, and by using false propaganda that suggested such accusations were merely the result of accomplished injustice with slander built on them - almost always were well prepared for such accusations.

The Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence against them. In the year 1817 [in Russia], a law was enacted on February 28 that the Superior Command announced on March 6 ( [5]) : It was prohibited to even suspect the Jews of such crimes, and the opinion that the Jews needed non-Jewish blood was called a prejudice.

Meanwhile, an examination of the places where the secret training of Talmudists took place recognizes the realization of this mutilation-murder, and the impartial view put forth in these case productions convinces, without doubt, the truth of their validity.

TALMUD

The Jews, since ancient times, still set their Talmud incomparably higher than the Old Testament, not less than it. By doing this, they could distort, in the most absurd way, the sense of one verse of a saint's writing and found the monstrous human sacrifice ceremony, described here. The prophet Balaam called for the damnation of Jewish people who refused to render from it. On the contrary, he used inspired praise as allegories. He promulgates:

“Behold, a people! As a lioness it rises up and as a lion it lifts itself; it does not lie down till it devours the prey, and drinks the blood of the slain”.

The enemy's Blood must be gorged on

Here is the source of the inhuman ritual murder ceremony. The interpreters accepted this allegory as direct sense; and they explain that the blood of their enemy - and Jews count the Christian as the primary enemy - must be gorged upon.

The Talmud was derived from different legends, with additions in the first few centuries of Christianity. It breaths with such a hatred against all non-believers, and especially against the Christians, that there exists no evil that could not be allowed against them.

The Talmud contains the incredibly absurd, ugly and immoral weaving of the most bizarre concoctions of fanaticism

It was written in a hardly conceivable mixture of Hebrew, Khaldei, Syrian, Partei, Greek, Latin, and other languages. The Babylonian Talmud, [6] which was finished in the V century, consists of 36 volumes; and it contains the incredibly absurd, ugly and immoral weaving of the most bizarre concoctions of fanaticism.

As a result, the language of the Talmud could not be classified as Jewish; this is a special Talmudic language - the most complicated of all live and dead languages, not excluding the Chinese language.

The Talmud is not only written as a mystic book, it is intentionally written in such a manner as to be something mysterious and hard to understand for the uninitiated persons, and even to this day it has remained inaccessible for us, in general, because it has not been translated, except of some fragments, into any common language.

In the Talmud printed in Hebrew, there are various omissions and marks

More than that, in the Talmud printed in Hebrew, there are blank spaces and other markings, such as parenthesis or appearances of the word “knew”, and, therefore, the meaning of it is to be guessed and further investigated.

The 1520 Venice edition is full of such places, and much of those dark spots was made intentionally vague. Later on, Jews, being cautious, filled those gaps with notes or via verbal study.

In the Jewish book Seider-Godaidois, the reasons for these intervals were explained: It was told that frequent conversion of Jews to Christianity, during the first few centuries of it, forced rabbis to adopt and include in the Talmud especially strict and cruel measures against the Nazareth inhabitants. [8]

However, these directives have brought the attention of the European governments in the IXth century, which was followed by the persecution of Jews, and that is why some things were partially excluded from Talmud or were changed so they do not specificalaly mention Christians (goys), but refer to them as idol worshippers (akum), even though Jews do not make any such distinctions among themselves, and in both cases generally imply Christians.

In the times of Pope Gregory, real persecutions of Jews were becoming common within almost the entire Europe, and the cause for that were the barbaric acts and crimes committed by Jews against the Christians, though our humaneness during this century falsely attributes the persecutions mostly to barbarism and intolerance of Catholicism.

The rabbis were forced to exclude from their books everything related to harming and insulting the Christians

The rabbis were forced to defend themselves, as the public discovered the rabbis' secrets; and, in spite of the large amount of money used by Jews for bribery, they were forced to exclude from their books all that related to harming and insulting the Christians.

The full Talmud, without the added gaps, looked for a shelter in Polish estates where the Jews, in general, had more freedom, and supervision over them was weaker. In those lands, the more fanatic and persistent Jews took shelter and took their refuge to this day, while education and oversight significantly changed the other European Jews and softened their stance.

Independently of this, there are many well written books by rabbis, some say up to 50 thousand, kept in great secrecy, and there exists among rabbis the the special so-called cabalistic sciences used for explanation and decoding the meaning out of seemingly arbitrary ordered blank spots and marks in the vague places of Talmud. [9]

This is why the Talmud is inaccessible, even to our philologists, whose testimonies as to what constitutes what in Talmud are generally unreliable. There are also verbal legends and studies of theirs, kept secret, and, once in a while, discovered by the converted Jews.

JEWS WHO CHANGED THEIR FAITH AND WRITERS

To the latter, for example, the former rabbi who became a monk, Neophyte, [10] belongs. He wrote in 1803, in the Moldavian language, the book Refutation of Jewish faith. The Jews, as they say, paid an extremely large amount of money to the ruler of Moldavia to destroy that book; in spite of that, however, a translation of it in the Greek language appeared in Yassi in print in 1818.

Among other things in that book, he talks about the blood stolen by Jews from Christians, and how it is used. After describing all the details of this monstrous ritual, monk Neophyte concludes:

My father revealed to me the mystery of blood

“When I turned 13 (the age of maturity for a Jew), my father revealed to me the mystery of blood, threatening me with fearful damnations if I would reveal this secret to anyone, even my brothers.

But if I have children, I shall be able to reveal this knowledge to only one of them, who is the most reliable, clever and deeply set in faith among them.

I was and I am now in great danger for revealing this secret. But, having learned the true faith and having appealed to my Savior; I refer all my hope to him”

Neophyte explains the following:

The mystery is only known to the Rabbis, Pharisees and khakam, called Hassidim

“The information about this ceremony was not written clearly in the books, but, rather, only mysteriously; the secret is known not by all, but only among some rabbis, khakams and Pharisees, who are known as the Hasidic Jews. [11]

Hassids believe that the killing of a Christian pleases God

Firstly, these vicious fanatical Jews, who engage in ritualistic murder, believe that the killing of a Christian pleases God;

They use blood for spells, according to superstitious rites

Secondly, they use blood for spells, according to superstitious rites.

Wedding farewell of Rabbi - Christian blood

For instance, on the day of wedding, the rabbi gives a newly married couple a baked egg, seasoned not with salt, but with ashes from a piece of linen, which has been moistened with the blood of a Christian martyr.”

This circumstance is extremely remarkable because in many cases where Jews were suspected of ritual murder, it was discovered that they had moistened a piece of canvas in blood and then divided it among themselves by cutting it in pieces.

[This is also described in this book:

The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice

“The young couple eat the egg,” Neophyte continues, “and the rabbi reads a prayer in which he wishes them to deceive the Christians and to feed on the fruits of their labor.

These vicious Jewish fanatics also use the blood of a murdered Christian at their ritualistic circumcision ceremony, dropping a drop of blood of a circumcised baby and another drop from a slain Christian baby into a cup with wine.”

And this fact is not less remarkable because it is repeated among various other sources of evidence, as shown below; and it is also discovered in other criminal cases regarding this subject. Following the Velizh case, a soldier Maksimova testified that Jews needed the blood, by their words, for a Jewish-woman during the childbirth. Similarly, Phyokla Seleznyova made a similar testimony from another case that occurred in Minsk during the year 1833.

Matzah with Christian blood

Neophyte also notes that when the Jews eat some “Matzah” [12] on Easter, while spewing all possible damnations for the Christians, they also bake one special piece of Matzah, powdering it with ashes mixed with blood of a Christian, and this particular piece of Matza is called “ephikoimon.”

And this circumstance is confirmed by the investigations on such cases, and also, by the above mentioned Velizh case. In that case, three Christian women, the Jewish servants, testified, each separately, that they kneaded dough for Matzahs, mixing in a little bit of blood obtained by Jews.

For anyone who has lived among the Jews, it is known that they really bake this special, sacred Matzah, which is made not only separately from others, but at different time, during the night on the eve of their Easter. Not only that, but during the creation of this mysterious Matzah, all the children, women and house inhabitants are sent out of the room, and the door is locked.

Into a special piece of Matzah, “ephikoimon.”, Hassidic Jews add some Christian blood

Into this very piece of Matzah, called “ephikoimon.”, the members of the Hasidic Jewish sect put in, if they could obtain it, the blood of a Christian.

Defenders of Jews have remarked that it was fair for the Jews to use blood, providing they had not caused a murder; and they should always be able to obtain the blood in some places, such as a barbershop, in general. However, this argument is groundless:

The mystery of this appalling ritual specifically requires the blood of a Christian obtained by tormenting an innocent baby but not the blood of some medical patient, who was accidentally cut by a barber.

Even in those cases where the Zhids were really satisfied with blood extraction without killing a man, the blood extraction, nevertheless, was always accompanied by violence, as is seen below from recent cases: the cutting out of the tip of a peasant's tongue in Volyn in 1833, and blood forcibly extracted from a girl in Lutsk in 1843.

Neophyte further states, that the Jews smear themselves with Christian blood to cure themselves from various ailments [13]; that at a funeral of such fanatical Jews, they use the egg white mixed with the Christian blood;

During the holiday of Purim, fanatical Jews kill a Christian and bake pastries with his blood

that during the holiday of “Purim,” in February, in memory of Mordechai and Esther, the fanatical Jews kill a Christian, instead of Haman, and bake the triangle-shaped honey cakes with a small drop of his blood and send them everywhere.

At the same time, Neophyte says, the Jews steal, if possible, Christian children, hold them locked up till Easter, and then viciously murder them, tormenting them, just as Christ was tortured, and they prefer the children, probably because they can be more easily obtained; and it is much easier and safer to manage them, since they are not as strong and they are still sinless.

Neophyte concludes, by the above said confirmation, about the message given to him by his father concerning this secret and about the damnations and threats from his father who said never to reveal it. “But,” he says, “recognizing our God, Jesus Christ, as my father, and the the holy church as my mother, I, hereby, announce the whole truth.”

To relieve the pain of a woman during childbirth, they give her some dried blood of a Christian baby

According to the testimonies of other Jews who converted to Christianity, Jews use three means to relieve the pain of a woman during childbirth: a husband stands by the door and reads the 54th chapter of the prophet Isaiah [14]; then he brings the five books of Moses from synagogue; and, finally, they give her some dried blood.

Many people state that this blood is from a Christian baby, which is also confirmed below by the statements from the Jewish books, specifically instructing that the blood of a man for our benefit (from ailments) is allowed to be used as food.

In addition, it is also confirmed by the criminal case in the province of Pinsk in 1833 where, as mentioned above, Phyokla Seleznyova testified that the Jew Savunya asked her to obtain some blood, at least a few drops, from the little finger of a Christian girl for a Jewish woman in childbirth.

So let us eat their bodies and drink their blood as commanded by the prophet Balaam

And there is one more savage reason for Jews to use the blood of Christians:

The Savior said to his pupils:

“This is body of Mine and blood of Mine.”

That phrase is the basis of receiving a communion with holy secrets via bread and wine symbolizing the body and blood of Jesus.

To insult and pervert this sacred act, the Jews of the fanatical sect of Hassids mix in some Christian blood, obtained through torment, into their Matzah (unleavened bread) dough, and say:

let's eat the body and blood of the Christian, as commanded by the prophet Balaam. [15]

Many writers of the last two centuries wrote about this subject and positively exposed the Jews who murdered Christian babies and told of how the Jews used blood. Some of these writers are mentioned below. Some are derived from real case examinations in Russia and Poland.

More than thirty writers have told all about this subject at different times; there are numerous testimonials during different times and in various states that envisage the secret studying of Jews, which helps to give some semblance of sense and meaning to this inhuman ceremony and prove its real existence.

This barbaric ceremony does exist, even though it is kept in great secrecy

For example, Brenz, having converted to Christianity from Judaism, positively states that this brutal ceremony does exist, even though it is kept in great secrecy, even among the Jews.

In a book about Jews (Zlosc Zydowska), by Pikulsky published in 1760 in Lemberg, it is told:

On the 15th day of the month of Shaipat, the foreman counts how much money was collected by the synagogue for the blood from a Christian for which all the Jews, from thirteen years of age and above, pay a fee.

Then, special Jews are hired to catch a Christian child, whom they lock in a cellar [16] and feed well for forty days, and then he is tortured to death.

At the same time, they try to obtain a particle of a Holy Sacrament the ritual desecration at this special ceremony. [17]

All of this is confirmed to a considerable degree by Velizh and other criminal cases: In the first one, it is seen from an intercepted note of the arrested Jews in which they remind any elected representatives of theirs about their duty to assist in any way they can and submit the petitions for the case, and, by the way, in that case, among other things, we can also see that the Jews bribed a woman to steal a little bit of Holy Sacrament food and, instead of swallowing it during the ceremony, spit it out onto a handkerchief and bring it to them, as she did.

One can find plenty of such cases in the works of the Byzantine historians, and it is also confirmed by the former Rabbi Seraphinovich, at the beginning of the last century in Brest, who converted to Christianity and consequently described the evil acts by Jews. He also noted that he himself has bought the Sacred Mystery food from Christians for the ritual desecration during this ceremony.

History of barbaric ritual murder of babies

Pikulsky further affirms that the secret Jewish book Zevkhelev explains this barbarous ceremony of murder of babies in the following manner:

Several decades after the crucifixion of the Savior, the Jews observed with horror that the Christian faith began to rapidly spread, and so they appealed to the oldest Talmudist, Jerusalem Rabbi Ravashe, [18] who found the remedy from this danger that threatened them, in the Jewish book Rambam, which states:

“Any pernicious thing can be destroyed only through the sympathetic application of another thing of the same kind.”

As evidence of this, book Rambam says that after killing the prophet Zechariah in the temple, blood has boiled at that place and nothing could be done to clean it off. Prince Nabuzardan, seeing this, asked the reason of this phenomenon and, with a response that is the blood of condemned animals, ordered to make an experiment in his presence to see if the blood of animals would boil in this way.

Sure of the deception, he forced through torture the confession of high priests of the murder of Zechariah, and wishing to take a revenge on the Jews for the death of the Prophet and to calm his blood, ordered the slaughter of many Jewish babies at the same place to quench the boiling of blood, and had actually achieved the desired result this way.

From this Ravashe concluded that no other can extinguish the flames of persistent enmity and vengeance of Christians than their own blood, in a secret sacrificial gift of innocent babies.

A baby being sacrificed is placed into a barrel, which is then rolled

Former Rabbi Seraphinovich tells the whole order of this heinous inhuman ceremony, not only as a witness but also as a participant. He says:

“One baby I ordered to be tied to a cross, and he was alive for a long time; another one I ordered to be nailed, and he died soon.”

He also says that this baby is placed into a barrel, which is then rolled, a circumstance confirmed in many similar criminal cases, and also, there is a special knife with a gold handle and a silver container, and in the Velizh case, it also refers to a knife with silver embellishments, that was even found, although its intended use was not completely proven at the time; [19]

We shed the blood of this illegitimately born, as we have shed the blood of their God

Serafinovich assures us that the Jewish book Gulen speaks of this barrel, and that the rabbi pronounces during this ritual:

We shed the blood of this illegitimately born, as we have shed the blood of their God, also illegitimate.”

In complete copies of the book Talmud Senhedrin according to Serafinovich, in the chapter 7 it says:

Christian children are illegitimate, as Scripture commands to to torture and kill the illegally born ones. The Talmud calls the dead Christians merely “carrion”, and forbids burying them;

[Ed: according to Talmud, only Judahites are people. All others, therefore, are animals and feces, even worse than dogs, thus, even if they marry, their marriage is null and void, and so their children are not born in legal marriage, and, therefore, are "illegally born".]

Pikulsky states specifically that a tortured child is not buried, but thrown out somewhere, or are thrown into the water: yet almost all these evil crimes were detected only because the distorted bodies of tortured children were accidentally being found in a field, in the woods, or floated up to the water's surface;

and if the Jews were not required by their [17] tradition to just throw out a distorted body of a martyr, it would be difficult to understand why don't they try to bury it, thus hiding it, so that it at least does not strike the eye of passersby.

Pikulsky explains further why the Jews need the blood of Christian children:

on a certain day the vicious fanatics smear the door of some Christian; [20]

an egg With this blood is given to newlyweds;

at funerals the eyes of a dead one are smeared with egg white mixed with blood;

They put a little bit of blood into Matzah or unleavened bread and keep some of that Matzah in the synagogue, until fresh blood is obtained, and they moisten it with water and use it instead of blood if no fresh blood of a baby is available.

Blessing a Jew for good trade and frauds, the rabbi also gives him an egg with this blood.

During the holiday of “Purim” (“Aman”), the Jews send each other gifts, also with blood.

Also, says Pikulsky, they use this blood for different witchcraft rites, as hinted in the book of the Talmud Hohmes Nyster, although it is not stated clearly.

All this is quite in accordance with the statements of Neophyte above and with many criminal cases.

If a Jew kills a Christian, he is not to be punished

Further, says Pikulsky, in the book Senhedrin, Ch. 6 and 7, it says:

If a Jew kills a Christian, he will not be punished.

Jews interpret the latter this way: here, it is written a “Christian,” to hide the real meaning, but what it really means is that Jews should sacrifice the Christian children.

Enmity of Jews towards Christians can be satisfied only with Christian blood

But the most important interpretation of this heinous ritual, says Pikulsky, is that Jews think that killing the children of Christians symbolizes killing Christ, and that enmity of Jews towards Christians can be satisfied only with Christian blood.

Pikulsky goes on to say that the Jews, if they are out of luck, try to buy a child slave in Tsar-City; that the young boy should not be older than thirteen years, and that Jews are taking boys only, because Jesus was male. The examples below prove that these Jewish fanatics sometimes kill girls and even the adult men and women.

For some spells, says Pikulsky, Jews also use the blood released from the hand of a Christian, which is indeed confirmed by the case in Lutsk in 1843, discussed below, where Jews forcibly extracted some blood from a Christian girl's hand.

At the debate, which was held in 1759 in Lvov, between the Talmudists and their opponents, Jews, who do not recognize Talmud, there were arguments that those, who believe in Talmud, also believe in using the Christian blood; the argument:

“Yain-Udim” - red wine and “Yayin-Edym” [19] - Christian wine, are written in Hebrew with the same letters, and the only difference lies in the vowels; therefore, they claim, what is meant by it is not the wine, but, rather, the Christian blood.

In the book Talmud Tales, first published in Polish in Krakow and then, in 1794, in Russian in Pochaevsky, it is also affirmed that in the month of Nesen (April) the Jews crucify and torture a Christian baby if they can obtain him, and it is discussed in the books of Talmud Zihfelef and Hohmes Naiskobes, although the meaning is hidden and dark.

The author says that the Jews need the blood of a baby for various reasons:

  1. for spells that are used against the Christians [23];
  2. for the wedding ceremony;
  3. for the ceremony of a funeral;
  4. for Matzahs [unleavened bread];
  5. for the lucky turnovers on trade;
  6. for the holiday of “Aman,” where the rabbis put this blood into “brashna” and send it as presents.

The Jews use the blood of tortured infants in witchcraft rituals

Eisenmenger [24] also says that the Jews, as many writers are convinced, use the blood of tortured to death babies for witchcraft,

to stop the bleeding at circumcision;

for sexual excitation [25];

for women's diseases;

and, finally, for sacrificial reconciliation with God in general.

In all the current copies of Talmud, the meaning is incomplete and dangerous places are camouflaged

Above it was explained why Talmud, to this day, remains a secret, inaccessible to us, as was explained that all the existing copies of it are incomplete and dangerous places obscured with the intent to mystify, with extreme cunning, as, for example, that sometimes, according only to the rules, known only to initiates in the Kabbalistic mysteries, one should [20] not read the words as written, though they have meaning, but to rearrange the letters [Hebrew symbols], and thus derive completely different meaning;

but in other places, there are words inserted, each letter of which means the whole word, and, therefore, an imaginary word contains the entire aphorism in it. Despite this, however, the Talmud is still so rich in pointless, bizarre and disgusting to humanity utterly vicious fanaticism, that, of course, there exists no barbaric violence it would not allow the Jews to commit against the Christian.

No matter which oath the Jew is forced to take, as related to Christianity, no matter how you look at it, it would be utterly worthless and would never force any Talmudist to be bound by it.

[Ed: - Pope Innocent III - "arid barring their testimony as witnesses in legal matters".

Pope Innocent III in a long decree stated:

that Jews are not to be killed by anyone [but], they are to us dangerous as the insect in the apple, as the serpent in the breast ...

Since, therefore, they have already begun to gnaw like the rat, and to stink like the serpent, it is to our shame that the fire in our breast which is being eaten by them, does not consume them ...

Although Christian piety tolerates the Jews ... and allows them to continue with us, although the Moors will not tolerate them, they must not be allowed to remain ungrateful to us in such a way as to repay us with contumely, for favors, and contempt for our familiarity.

They are admitted to our familiarity only through our mercy ...

Under this same Pope, Canons 67-70 were adopted by the Fourth Lateran Council, which included protective measures against

(their license for perjury under the "Kol Nidre" then being well known).

The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling.

Jews consider everything said about people in the Old Testament is applicable exclusively to Jews

All that is said in the Old Testament about people, about man and humanity, the Jews relate actually and exclusively to themselves just because they are the only ones that are actually people, but other peoples, on the basis of the Gemara, are nothing but brutes or animals.

Let us cite, for example, a few extracts from the Talmud, written down by baptized Jew Pozdersky for the Velizh case.

Only Jews are human beings

[Note from translator of this version:

In the following quotes the original Russian text uses the word that literally means "the one of another faith", which in essence means non-Jew, or non-Judaist and so in this translation the term "non-Jew" was used generally throughout the book.

It would be incorrect to call them non-Judaists, infidels or non-believers since the word clearly implies the one who does have faith, but not Jewish faith.

Basically, Talmudists do not make any distinction between any kind of non-Jews, religious or atheists, regardless of their national origin. They use several words to label all non-Jews, such as "heathen", "akum", "goy", "foreigners" and so on. But it is all the same thing as far as they are concerned.

Basically, and essentially, as various researchers and historians state in their studies, this refers to Christians. There is a special enmity towards Christians as teachings of Jesus go directly against the Judaism cult, as he clearly calls them satanists. Thus the most vicious kind of hate, violence and barbarism is directed specifically and squarely against Christians.

And it is not merely some plain ordinary hate, it is hate the likes of which the mankind has never known, hate that caused the most horrendous violence, destruction and murder of hundreds of millions of people throughout history.

It is hate against the very notion of Good, the most fundamental hate there is, destruction versus creation, parasitism versus creativity, hate versus love, evil versus good.

Secondly, as Judaism, which is not really a religion, but ideology, based on myths of racial superiority, as expressed in this myth of "god's chosen people", which they themselves know to be nothing more than ugly concoction, used to delude others, Judaists consider all non-Judaists, regardless of their faith, pretty much the same kind of entities of animalistic nature.

So, this term generally applies to all non-Jews, whom they call "gentiles", which is a fake notion in itself, invented by Talmudic Judaists specifically for the racial distinction purposes and creation of clearly false "special status" of Jews, "superior" to all others, as is clearly stated in the tape recorded interview with Harold Wallace Rosenthal.

According to him, there is no such a thing as Gentiles, and Judaism is not a religion, it is just a facade to disguise it in religious form. But the one exclusive purpose of "Jews" is "to get". THAT is their belief system, which they deceptively disguise as religion, just to elevate its status.

If there is any kind of "religion" involved, it is basically occult and it eventually reduces to plain ordinary satanism:

"Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer
... - and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive."

Harold Rosenthal was supposedly murdered for giving this interview in 1976 during which he boasted about how a group of Jews are manipulating the stupid and gullible Goyim.

The Hidden Tyranny - Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview is highly recommended to study that interview, and not merely skim over it. Because its bluntness and openness and knowledge of the deepest secrets are quite revealing.

“You, Jews, are people, and not the other nations of the world”.

Therefore, the Talmud permits any injury, violence and theft towards non-Jews:

“From your neighbor take away nothing, as commandment says;
but your neighbor is a Jew, but not all other nations of the world.”.

Thus, the Talmud interprets: the Old Testament literally, from beginning to the end, in every instance makes this distinction, calling the man and a fellow Jew, only an Israelite, but not a Gentile.

"Bless the dead, when you come across a coffin of a Jew, and curse the dead of other people and say, dishonored is your mother, and blushes the one who gave you birth, and so on".

"If anyone says that God took upon himself human flesh, he is a liar (epikoyres), and is worthy of death; therefore, a Jew is permitted to to testify falsely against such man.

“A non-Jew, who killed another non-Jew, as well as a Jew who murdered a Jew is punishable by death; but a Jew who murdered non-Jew is not punishable.”

“If an non-Jew is reading the Talmud, he is worthy of death, because in the Old Testament it says: Moses gave us a heritage of law;ie, has given us, but not other peoples.”

It remains to refute yet another evidence, given in favor of Jews, ie, that the Mosaic law forbids them, as you know - the use of blood with food. On that, we reply:

firstly, according to the teachings of the Talmud and the rabbis, military service and illness in general are exempt from the law in general and the prohibition on certain foods;

secondly, Talmud, specifically permits, in certain cases, to use in a mixture with meals the blood of fish and human (Talmudic book Ioredeo, section 66, sheet 53), and it says on this subject so:

“blood of an animal, beast and bird is prohibited; fish blood is not prohibited, if one can determine acoording to positive indicators, for example, by scales, it can be known that it is really from fish.”

Human blood is prohibited also by its appearance, because it can not be distinguished from the animal one, therefore, human blood, left from the teeth on a bread crust, has to be scraped off; but the blood that ended up in a mouth for some reason may be swallowed. [22]

In general, fish and human blood, by Talmudic law, is not prohibited; in any mixture with meals, it is allowed. In book “Sulkhan Arukh,” p. 42, 67, it is stated clearly:

“Blood of livestock and animal is not allowed to be used in food, but the blood of man, for the benefit of ours, is allowed.”

The Jews claim that this refers to diseases where the blood was used in ancient times as a cure, but the explanation given for the above citation specifically states:

“Christians have long been forewarned, but we can not do without blood, for the purposes described in the book Toysvyus.”

“not to be friends with Christians, where you need to ... so they will not learn about shedding blood.”

And this [tripple dot above] is an example of a gap in Talmud, of course, more than only suspicious one.

There are also verbal testimonies of baptized Jews about their sacrament of blood. For example, a warrant-officer Savitsky, baptized Jew, testified in a case in the former Grodno province in 1816 accident that the Jews really use the Christian blood, and for this purpose torture babies.

According to him, this rite is performed in the middle of April, for the holiday of Passover, that is, on Easter, in memory of the slaughter of the lamb, the lintel is sprayed with blood of a baby, or touched with a thread, dipped in the blood. All of this is quite in accordance with the above information and testimonies, as well as the circumstances of the former cases.

Savitsky testified further: