A note about ritual murders of babies and how these Jews use the babies' blood

Continued 2/2

Babies for sacrifice are used mainly because they are easier to handle and easier to obtain

babies are used mainly because they are easier to handle and easier to obtain;

every Jew, who had succeeded with this, is given the forgiveness of his sins;

there are detailed rules for torturing a baby, his crucifixion, and so on, and all of it must be performed in the synagogue; [23]

but if there is a danger that it could become known, it is permitted to kill a Christian wherever and whenever possible, without observing any specific rituals;

because the barrel, in which it is directed to roll the baby being sacrificed, in order to attract the sub-skin blood, in recent times has been eliminated, and specifically by the former rabbi of Vilna, Elijah, a Hassid.

Sawicki asked only to protect him from the very dangerous persecution of the Jews, and in that case, was willing to reveal everything; but his proposal was not accepted.

During the torture ritual of a baby Jews read a prayer from the book Mangogima

He testified, among other things, that the Jews read during the torture of a baby the following prayer, from the book Mangogim [26]:

“Rejoice and be happy, let this blood be extracted in eternal memory, not of this baby, but of a sick Kudr (Savior).”

Then, from book of Seider, the prayer “Oleina”:

“The Christians worship the idols, stone or wood depicting Christ on them, but they do not get from him any help.”

Let His name disappear and let those who have faith in him perish also, like a grass that dried out and as wax melted.”

The above mentioned Hasidic Jew wrote about this very rare, and kept in great secret, book with title “Tsivui.”

Soldier Phyodorov of Leib-guard Finland regiment, a baptized Jew, during the proceedings in the Velizh case testified in 1830 that according to the well-known and secretly preserved by Jews teachings, they really need the blood of the Christians for their holiday of “Pesach” (Passover), to be added to the Matzah (unleavened bread); and that His father, Fedorov told him that he himself, as he was sure of, had eaten some of the unleavened bread With this blood.

Fedorov had been exposed as giving some false testimonies [24] when he was trying to earn some credit and explain the details of the Velizh case, known to him only superficially; it, nevertheless, does not prove that his entire testimony was also unfounded, especially if it agrees with all other information about this subject.

Baptized Jew Grudinsky on the same case showed the same thing. Many of his statements were false; however, he, with great detail and in accordance with other information, described the procedure and the purpose of this fanatical ritual.

Secret book Rambam contains a detailed description of the ritual sacrifice rite

He stated that there is a book, kept in great secret, called “Rambam” (Gandoma Zerich dmey Akuma selmytsves), which contains a detailed description of this rite;

that he had seen and read this book, and that, on this copy, all the ammunition needed to carry out this inhuman rite was shown in form of armature or decor;

that for this purpose there is an iron crown at the synagogue, two small iron spears, a knife for circumcision ceremony, semicircular chisel for grooved wound in the side of the infant;

a barrel, in which they roll him to cause the blood to move to the surface of the body, and described in most minute detail and precision the looks and special design of it in a way that only a person who carefully studied that barrel could describe it.

He also said that this barbaric ritual is somewhat different when they torture, for lack of a boy, a girl, and this is also in accordance with the testimony of soldier Terentyeva in Velizh case.

The girl was tortured to death by the Jews, who clipped her nails to the flesh and cut off her nipples

Grudinsky states, among other things, that girls should be rolled in in a different kind of barrel than boys, that this barrel is designed differently, and Terentyeva, the former accomplice [25] in several such mutilatings herself, testifies namely, that the girl was tortured by Jews in the same way by cutting off her nails and nipples, whereas the boy was subjected to the Jewish circumcision, but the girl was rolled in another, differently designed barrel.

Infant must be purchased from any Christian for 30 silver coins

Grudinsky added one more, apparently insignificant, but in fact an extremely important detail:

namely, that in remembrance of Judas Iscariot's betrayal of the Saviour, infant must be purchased from any Christian for 30 silver coins;

but, if necessary, it is permitted to the Jews to abduct children, and, in return, to give, under any pretext, even at different times and into different hands, 30 coins.

This evidence is important because almost in all such cases where the seduced Christians have confessed that they brought the baby to Jews for money, and specifically for thirty coins.

Thus, in the Minsk case of in 1833, Fekla Selezneva testified that the Jew Orco Sabuni promised her 30 rubles for a Christian child;

Nikulsky (“Zlosc Zydowska,” 1760, Lemberg) says that the Jews pay for blood and for baby purchasing two zloties each, or 30 kopeck of silver;

Seraphinovich, about whom was said above, confesses himself that he was paid 30 ten ruble coins, and etc.

Grudinsky and others explain the bararically vicious ritual as follows:

Our Saviour, in the opinion of the Jews was not the son of God but of man, and he performed miracles using black magic. By this means he turned the Israelites, called by him possessed [by evil], into a herd of pigs and drowned them in a lake;

then Christians eat pigs, [26] although they know that this is blood of Israelis [who were turned into pigs];

and Jews, whom God commanded to crucify and torture Christ, now [merely] repeat it, doing the same thing to his followers, satisfying their revengefulness with blood of their babies and condemn them to slaughter, instead of the Passover lamb.

All the rules of the Talmud contain the doctrine of destruction

One of the most remarkable books on this subject, without doubt, is the work of Abbe Kiarini, published in Paris in 1830 and dedicated to the Emperor. Kiarini with exemplary impartiality examines the basic teachings of the Jews and proves that all the rules of the Talmud contain destructive doctrine, that does not recognize either society except of Jewish, or even the very humanity itself, or a human as such, apart from a Jewish and a Jew.

Racism 001

“For positive confirmation that an accusation of Jewish ritual murder is not simply slander or fiction, and that not one torture of the Middle Ages extorted from Jews this horrible acknowledgement, it is necessary to examine in more detail one of the better-known and well-documented cases of such. For example, the Velizh case was started on April 24, 1823 by the Velizh city police, and finished on January 18, 1835, a 12-year investigation in common meeting of State Council.”

... statement made by the former Israeli prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir, in reference to the African nations who voted in support of the 1975 U.N. resolution, which denounced Zionism as a form of racism.

He said:

"It is unacceptable that nations made up of people who have only just come down from the trees should take themselves for world leaders ...

How can such primitive beings have an opinion of their own?"

And the point of this is? That Israel isnt racist?

Supremacy 003

"According to Jewish belief, the Jewish People constitutes a species of their own. ..i.e., a special, separate act of Creation by the Almighty. 'The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought' of the Almighty when creating the Universe according to the teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac."

Chabad 004

The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: "Let us differentiate."

Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level.

Rather, we have a case of "let us differentiate" between totally different species.

This is what needs to be said about the body:

the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world...

...An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.

We therefore ask:

Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews:

A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews."

-- The Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson

(Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky. (1999). Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Pluto Press, p.B8-62)

Fake-wisdom of vicious fanaticism and intolerance

Kiarini exposes the fake-wisdom, vicious fanaticism and intolerance in the contents of secret teachings; he wrote his book with high and noble purpose: to investigate, in the most detailed way, all the details of real life and the attitudes of Jews, and to point out the ways of taking these unfortunate people out of this disastrous situation.

Therefore Kiarini does not exhibit the slightest hatred for the Jews, and, limited exclusively by research findings, looks at this nation with Christian humility. Not less than that, however, referring to the subject of the note to this, he says:

“The purpose of this bloody, superstitious ritual, which, probably, finds the followers only among a small number of fanatics of the lowest-class Jews, is to lure via different means the Christian children and sacrifice them at the time of Israel's Passover.

Perhaps, by this, [27] the memory of God's killing, committed by their ancestors, or blood of babies is used for barbarically vicious purposes, and, possibly, for both of those reasons together.

Raymond Martin argues that this custom is based on the saying of the Talmud; but I find in his words only the permission to secretly murder Christians, the permission, which these fanatic people could certainly explain in their own way.

We also see in the word “secretly” either a slip of the tongue or justification, if the crime is not executed; and we also see that the Talmud commands the Jews in clear words to try to crush and afflict anything Christian just before their sacramental holidays, to distract them, Christians, from performance of rituals of the church and not to let them quietly enjoy their sacred celebration. This doctrine, of course, may be construed by Zhids at will.

This place is the Talmud, as Kiarini observed, is distorted intentionally in the newest editions to avoid the suspicion of Christians.

Then, he continues:

“to deny that Jews in many European lands, in utter fanaticism, have performed this inhuman rite (murder of Christian babies) would be to delete from the pages of history dozens of events or incidents, described in detail and proven with all the well-grounded thoroughness;

it would mean to demolish and annihilate several monuments, preserved in some cities, along with the legends about this terrible crime;

finally, it would mean to accept, without any reason, the false witnesses of people who are still alive and saw with their own eyes, if not the execution of crimes, then at least [28] the undoubted efforts to do so.

During the current year (1827) Jews in Warsaw, for a joke, as they allege, caught a Christian child and locked him in the trunk, [27] where he was found. But if you consider that this was done, as usual, a day or two before Easter, and that the Jews took care of all the precautionary measures according to the Talmudic teachings, then it would be really hard to hide such actions behind the mask of an inappropriate joke.”

In The Ministry of Internal Affairs there exists a written extract from the Jewish book Etz Chaim (Tree of Life), written in the XVII century by Rabbi Chaim Vytal, who lived in Poland.

The translator on this occasion declared in writing that the custom of torturing Christian children, as he was certain, does exist in really among the Jews.

This citation or its translation [from Hebrew] by itself is a complete proof of the contested issue; and if even the rabbi had courage to write such a thing without hesitation in his published book, than there is no doubt that there would be enough fanatics blinded enough, that would be willing to commit such inhumane acts of evil most profound.

Ed. note: In the citations from the scriptures below the text significantly differs from what you can find in any modern version of the scriptures.

Interesting to note here that the text of the citation corresponds to Jewish version of the scriptures and it seems to completely pervert the very meaning as you can find in any modern translation. What you can find in any version is not some sacred particle of holiness, but a slaughter of people and devouring their flesh and blood on animalistic level.

Here is a translation of his hand written citation:

“Any animal preserves, through his life, a certain sacred particle of holiness of God.

“Man, no matter who he is, preserves more of this sacredness while he is alive than an animal. [29]

“When will slaughter an animal, then the shadow of life, together with known particle of holiness leaves it, and moves towards the benefit of those, who use this animal in their food; but, as long as a shadow of life is not yet departed, then remaining in it well-known particle of holiness forbids us to use it in food.

So it is said in the holy Scripture and of a human being, Vol. Numbers, Ch. 14, art. 9:

"They are for our food now, moved away from them their shadow."

“This shows us, through hints, that since they no longer possess the particle of holiness, they are, as slaughtered animals or bread, are presented to us for food;

therefore it is said in the Book of Numbers, Ch. 23, Art. 23:

[Ed: actually Art. 24 in all modern versions]

‘These people (Israelites) shall not lie down till they devour their prey, and drink the blood of the slain;

which hints at people who are not preserving within themselves any holiness given from above.

From all thereof, we conclude that by killing of a goy and drinking blood (of infidel) the holiness of Israel or Jews is magnified.

That is what is written in the book Etz Chaim, and after such a dramatic and undeniable proof of the existence among Jews of such a stupendously evil ritual one can only assert that the Jews for the most part do not follow these instructions, but to deny their very existence is impossible.

Thus, we can see that all the writers and the baptized Jews who claim the existence of this rite, describe the purpose, meaning and procedures involved very similarly; and if we add what will be revealed below, and that is, in all the cases where these acts of evil were discovered, and where torture or obvious evidence and conscience complelled [30] a confession, which quite agrees with the above mentioned writers and with commonly known stories and tales among people, then, it seems, the case may be considered solved.

What is the significance, in comparison with this evidence, and with indisputable events, of the rhetorical exclamations of philanthropists and cosmopolitans, or testimonies of a few educated and honest Jews, who are not privy to these mysteries, or the assurances of scientists that it would be contrary to the fundamental laws of Moses? In this spirit we can find a refutation or denouncements made in public by the English Jews in the parliament;

In the same spirit there was made a solemn vow by few baptized German Jews, and, finally, using the same weapon, some writers have passionly defended the Jews, as, for example, the scientist Gittsig [28] with his colleagues in his latest legal treatise: “Der neu Pitaval.”.

All this may mislead only those who are not even briefly familiar either with barbaric fanaticism of obdurate Jews, nor with the events and the court cases related to these matters, but none of it can make black out of white, and fictitious out of actual.