WW2 Propaganda

Flames never rise from crematorium chimneys, so what exactly has been incinerated all this time, truth? Eighty years on, this anti-White propaganda suppresses White people into guilt, shame, and self-loathing and also to annihilate from conceptual thought any trace of a homogenous and ethnocentric homeland; free from usury, debt slavery and crucifying genocidal decimations.


Propaganda is a modern Latin word, the neuter plural gerundive form of propagare, meaning 'to spread' or 'to propagate', thus propaganda means the things which are to be propagated. Originally this word derived from a new administrative body (congregation) of the Catholic Church created in 1622 as part of the Counter-Reformation, called the Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (Congregation for Propagating the Faith), or informally simply Propaganda. Its activity was aimed at "propagating" the Catholic faith in non-Catholic countries.

Woodcuts (1545) known as the Papstspotbilder or Depictions of the Papacy in English, by Lucas Cranach, commissioned by Martin Luther. Title: Kissing the Pope's Feet. German peasants respond to a papal bull of Pope Paul III. Caption reads: "Don't frighten us Pope, with your ban, and don't be such a furious man. Otherwise we shall turn around and show you our rears.".

Identifying propaganda has always been a problem. The main difficulties have involved differentiating propaganda from other types of persuasion, and avoiding a biased approach. Richard Alan Nelson provides a definition of the term:

“Propaganda is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified target audiences for ideological, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages (which may or may not be factual) via mass and direct media channels.”.

Propaganda can often be recognised by the rhetorical strategies used in its design. In the 1930s, the Institute for Propaganda Analysis identified a variety of propaganda techniques that were commonly used in newspapers and on the radio, which were the mass media of the time period. Propaganda techniques include "name calling" (using derogatory labels), "bandwagon" (expressing the social appeal of a message), or "glittering generalities" (using positive but imprecise language). The propagandist seeks to change the way people understand an issue or situation for the purpose of changing their actions and expectations in ways that are desirable to the interest group.

“Sociologist Jeffrey K. Hadden has argued that members of the anti-cult movement and Christian counter-cult movement accuse the leaders of what they consider cults of using propaganda extensively to recruit followers and keep them.”.

Propaganda, in this sense, serves as a corollary to censorship in which the same purpose is achieved, not by filling people's minds with approved information, but by preventing people from being confronted with opposing points of view. What sets propaganda apart from other forms of advocacy is the willingness of the propagandist to change people's understanding through deception and confusion rather than persuasion and understanding. The leaders of an organization know the information to be one sided or untrue, but this may not be true for the rank and file members who help to disseminate the propaganda.

The German Corpse Factory or Kadaververwertungsanstalt (literally "Carcass-Utilization Factory"), also sometimes called the "German Corpse-Rendering Works" or "Tallow Factory" was one of the most notorious anti-German atrocity propaganda stories circulated in World War I. According to the story, the Kadaververwertungsanstalt was a special installation supposedly operated by the Germans in which, because fats were so scarce in Germany due to the British naval blockade, German battlefield corpses were rendered down for fat, which was then used to manufacture nitroglycerine, candles, lubricants, and even boot dubbin.

On 25th April the weekly British humorous magazine Punch printed a cartoon entitled "Cannon-Fodder—and After," which showed the Kaiser and a German recruit. Pointing out of a window at a factory with smoking chimneys and the sign "Kadaververwertungs[anstalt]," the Kaiser tells the young man: "And don't forget that your Kaiser will find a use for you—alive or dead.".

Historian Piers Brendon has called it "the most appalling atrocity story" of World War I, while journalist Phillip Knightley has called it "the most popular atrocity story of the war." After the war John Charteris, the British former Chief of Army Intelligence, allegedly stated in a speech that he had invented the story for propaganda purposes, with the principal aim of getting the Chinese to join the war against Germany. Recent scholars do not credit the claim that Charteris created the story. Propaganda historian Randal Marlin says "the real source for the story is to be found in the pages of the Northcliffe press", referring to newspapers owned by Lord Northcliffe.

During June and July 1943, two prominent representatives of the Moscow-based “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” toured the United States and raised more than two million dollars for the Soviet war effort at a series of mass meetings. At each of these rallies, Soviet Jewish leader Solomon Mikhoels [served as chairman during World War II] showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses. After the war, the soap story was given important legitimacy at the main Nuremberg trial. L. N. Smirnov, Chief Counsellor of Justice for the USSR, declared to the Tribunal:

Alleged Jewish Soap
a ficticious crucifixion story of Jewish soap, ethnic cleansing "dirty" Germanic peoples.

“The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods of complete annihilation of human bodies, which would not only conceal the traces of their crimes, but also to serve in the manufacturing of certain products. In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out.”.

It is worth emphasizing here that the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg Tribunal for the bogus soap story was no less substantial than the “evidence” presented for the claims of mass extermination in “gas chambers.”. After the war, supposed Holocaust victims were solemnly buried, in the form of soap bars, in Jewish cemeteries. In 1948, for example, four such bars wrapped in a funeral shroud were ceremoniously buried according to Jewish religious ritual at the Haifa cemetery in Israel.

The Yad Vashem Memorial stated that the Nazis did not produce soap with fat which was extracted from Jewish corpses on an industrial scale, saying that the Nazis may have frightened camp inmates by deliberately circulating rumors in which they claimed that they were able to extract fat from human corpses, turn it into soap, mass-produce and distribute it.

Other bars of “Jewish soap” has been displayed as grim Holocaust relics at the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw, the Stutthof Museum near Gdansk (Danzig), the Yivo Institute in New York, the Holocaust Museum in Philadelphia, the Jewish Holocaust Centre in Melbourne (Australia), and at various locations in Israel.


Unlike the stigmatizing holocaust industry, there are no expensive purchasable tickets to view the suppressed factualities written onto these very pages; the real cost it seems is the ignorant castigation of not only me but thousands of others before me who have freely published this invaluable information. In evaluated view of these efforts, I request that you decide for yourself by creating and substantiating a genuinely informed opinion from assessing factual evidence that is oh so not popular in most social circles where facts are scoffed at, rendered down with ridicule and eventually silenced unspeakable, suppressed under a repressive, anti-social construct of repressive tollerance.

Propagandist Deborah Lipstadt.

“Ultimately and with this I conclude, our objective should be to create a society where denial of the genocide is seen as so outrageous, and so despicable that anyone who engages in it would be rendered a pariah”.

Deborah Lipstadt lawyer is Anthony Robert Julius, in 1999 Julius married Dina Rabinovitch, daughter of infamous anti-White Rabbi Nachum Eliezer Rabinovitch, Rabbi Rabinovitch said:

“The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, white men with black women. Thus, the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means the end of white man and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory”.

People cannot seem to fathom that being on the winning side of the war that propaganda during and after that war could, just might, be false. Questioning the Holocaust has become illegal in 17 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Switzerland.

Upon the holocaust mememorial in the Hague the Germanic people have been demonised as the Amalek (blood lickers).

"Davidster" (Star of David) by Dick Stins is a Holocaust memorial in The Hague. The text at the side (in Dutch and Hebrew) is from Deuteronomy 25:17, 19 – "Remember what Amalek has done to you ... do not forget."

In Judaism, Amalekites came to represent the archetypal enemy of the Jews. In Jewish folklore, the Amalekites are considered to be the symbol of evil. Three of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) involve Amalek:

When you cannot question anything, through fear of being socially outcast, stigmatized or worse prosecuted and locked up; then you begin to ask why the petitioned authorities attempt to suppress and stifle those genuinely seeking to substantiate the truth in hindsight of this matter.

Concentration Camps

From 1933 to 1945, it is claimed NSDAP Germany operated more than a thousand concentration camps (German: Konzentrationslager), including subcamps on its own territory and in parts of German-occupied Europe. Concentration camps are conventionally held to have been invented by the British during the Second Boer War.


Mass concentration and internment of a Jewish instigated insurgency that formulated an attempted communist overthrow of a democratically elected National Socialist Germany. There is no doubt that thousands died at Auschwitz of a horrific disease named typhus that spread from inmate to inmate, carried by a bloodsucking, transient vector of parasitic body lice.

Arbeit macht frei
Hitler forged into Iron a plan to reform the Jews through work, “Arbeit macht frei” translated in English means “Work sets you Free”; astoundingly, questioning any information displayed and taught at the Holocaust Museum located within the gates of Auschwitz is now a punishable crime in Germany

But despite nationalist grievances, there was and still is no actual scientific evidence to back up and corroborate the endless accusations of wilful mass murder as found at this now infamous WW2 internment camp? The gas chambers presented by the museum are a scientific impossibility, as is of burning thousands of bodies in cremation pits amidst the rising water table which caused outbreak after outbreak of deadly, virulent strains of waterborne typhus.

Aushwitz Propaganda Chimney

In 1947, the occupying Red Army i.e. Soviets built a fake chimney (for the specific purpose of propaganda) next to the Auschwitz I alleged “gas chamber” to make the building appear more convincing when viewing from the front. The red brick 30ft chimney is not even attached to the “gas chamber” building.

Auschwitz's propaganda chimney, after 1947
Auschwitz's propaganda chimney before 1947
Fake Chimney
Auschwitz fake chimney, not attached to the building
Guards house
low chimney in dangerous proximity to guard's house
Inflated death toll

Franciszek Piper, former Head of Historical department of the Auschwitz Museum has through the mainstream media sources been credited with bringing the down Aushwitz official death toll (from his scientific analysis of the sources and findings on the deportations to Auschwitz) from four million to one and a half million; a somewhat significant reduction of almost three million deaths.

Memorial plaque to those killed by the Nazis in Auschwitz, put in place in 1948 and removed in 1989.
Replacement Memorial plaque with a reduced by three million! death toll presently on display.

“In Crematory IV, 1,000 people were alleged to have been crowded into a room measuring 10 meters long, 4 meters wide and 1.6 meters high, and then homicidally gassed.”.

When Professor Piper findings are viewed in more detail we find that that out of this academic's assertion of a death toll total of 1.1 million 'Jewish' detainee deaths, about eighty-one per cent of Jews transported to Auschwitz by the Holocaust trains, or 890,000 men, women, and children, met their deaths immediately upon arrival and were “not registered”; however no forensic evidence to substantiate this allegation exists today.

Red Cross death toll
Official “Red Cross” concentration camp death toll published inside early post WW2 history books
Red Cross letter
Red Cross letter, describing delegates visiting Auschwitz, find no evidence of extermination.

“Of the 2.4 million Jews living in NAZI-occupied Europe, alas 6 million died. The good news? 5 million survived to claim compensation.”.

Camp Commander: Rudolf Höss

Having been tortured, Rudolf Höss, who was the commander of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children. Even if torture and duress cannot be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the Höss confession is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible. Yet, Höss’s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg, in 1947, and subsequently hanged on April 16th, 1947, in Poland.

Rudolf Höss in Custody
Rudolf Höss in Custody

On March 11, 1946, the British took Höss into custody and immediately began questioning him. Höss signed a statement under oath in German (later given document number NO-1210 by the IMT) on March 14 (March 15?) at 2:30 in the morning. Two days later on March 16, Höss signed a statement under oath in English:

“I, personally, arranged on orders received from Himmler in May 1941 the gassing of two million persons between June/July 1941 and the end of 1943 during which time I was commandant of Auschwitz”.

Höss later signed an affidavit that was quoted extensively at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. It was this affidavit that laid the foundation for and later validated the extermination story of Auschwitz. The affidavit, in English, dated April 5, 1946, read in part:

I, RUDOLF FRANZ FERDINAND HOESS, being first duly sworn, depose and say as follows: 2. I commanded Auschwitz until 1 December 1943, and estimate that at least 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease, making a total dead of about 3,000,000. This figure represents about 70% or 80% of all persons sent to Auschwitz as prisoners, the remainder having been selected and used for slave labour in the concentration camp industries. Included among the executed and burnt were approximately 20,000 Russian prisoners of war (previously screened out of Prisoner of War cages by the Gestapo) who were delivered to Auschwitz in Wehrmacht transports operated by regular Wehrmacht officers and men. The remainder of the total number of victims included about 100,000 German Jews, and great numbers of citizens, mostly Jewish, from Holland, France, Belgium, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Greece, or other countries. We executed about 400,000 Hungarian Jews alone in the summer of 1944.

Hoss Testimony
Hoss Testimony

The Höss “confession” further alleges that Jews were already being exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps: Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The “Wolzek” camp mentioned by Höss is a total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, those who accept the Holocaust story currently claim that gassings of Jews did not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.

“I was treated terribly by the [British] Field Security Police. I was dragged to Heide and, of all places, to the same military barracks from which I had been released eight months before by the British. During the first interrogation, they beat me to obtain evidence. I do not know what was in the transcript, or what I said, even though I signed it because they gave me liquor and beat me with a whip. It was too much even for me to bear. The whip was my own. By chance, it had found its way into my wife's luggage. My horse had hardly ever been touched by it, much less the prisoners. Somehow, one of the interrogators probably thought that I had used it to constantly whip the prisoners. After a few days, I was taken to Minden on the Weser River, which was the main interrogation center in the British zone. There they treated me even more roughly, especially the first British prosecutor, who was a major. The conditions in the jail reflected the attitude of the first prosecutor. Surprisingly, after three weeks I was shaved, my hair was cut, and I was allowed to wash myself. My handcuffs had not been opened since my arrest.”.

On May 8, 1945, the Soviet “Extraordinary State Commission” issued its estimate that the number of victims at Auschwitz and Birkenau had been four million. The subsequent Polish Commission of investigation into the numbers of victims, which ran from 1945 to 1946, agreed with the Soviet report. In 1947, the Supreme National Tribunal in Poland condemned Höss in part for the deaths of between three and four million people. Later, Höss attempted to reduce his estimate of the Auschwitz death toll to 1.13 million, but it did him no good. On the basis of this verdict, Polish authorities executed Höss at Auschwitz. In 1991, Kazimierz Smolen, long-time director of the State Auschwitz Museum, declared, “In my view, no one can deny the number of 4 million.”.

Ernst Zundel - German Prisoners Tortured Until They Signed Confessions.

For more than 30 years, Rudolf Höss has been the best witness to Auschwitz gassing claims. In many ways, the entire weight of claims of mass gassing rests on his testimony; with Höss removed from the chain of evidence, there is no link among various scattered documents and testimonies that combine to provide the “proof” of Nazi gassings.

Gas Chambers

Each year for decades, tens of thousands of visitors to Auschwitz have been shown an execution “gas chamber” in the main camp, supposedly in its “original state.” In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine L'Express acknowledged that “everything” about this “gas chamber” is “false,” and that it is, in fact, a deceitful postwar reconstruction.

American execution technician Fred A. Leuchter (an expert on gas execution chambers) compiled a report titled “The Leuchter Report: An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek, Poland”. The investigation began in 1988 to investigate the feasibility of mass homicidal gassings, specifically at Auschwitz.

“It took from three to fifteen minutes to kill the people in the death chamber, depending upon climatic conditions. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. We usually waited about one half-hour before we opened the doors and removed the bodies. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses”.

Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a careful on-site examination of the “gas chambers” at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: “I have come to the conclusion that no one was wilfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider it absolutely impossible.”.

Even noted ‘Nazi hunter’ Simon Wiesenthal has acknowledged (in 1975 and again in 1993) that “there were no extermination camps on German soil“

‘French’Jew historian Olga Wormser-Migot likewise concluded in her detailed 1968 study of the German concentration camp system that the stories of execution gas chambers in Germany proper and Austria are mythical. Part of the reason for the persistence of baseless ‘gas chamber’ stories, she wrote, is confusion about the distinction between a gas chamber and a crematory. Another factor, perhaps more basic, is an ‘unconscious desire’ to keep alive the memory of the evil wartime treatment of the Jews. Psychologically, the ‘gas chamber’ has become one of the “leitmotifs of the heroic epic of the deportation“.

Mass Cremation

Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as has often been alleged. Ivan Lagacé, manager of a large crematory in Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in crematoriums and open pits is simply “preposterous” and “beyond the realm of reality,” he declared under oath.

Electrocuted and Vaporised

At one time, it was seriously claimed that at Auschwitz, Jews were systematically killed with electricity. American newspapers in February 1945, citing a Soviet eyewitness report from the recently-liberated camp, told readers that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an “electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces.

They were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage fields.” And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief US prosecutor Robert Jackson charged that the Germans had used a “newly invented” device to instantaneously “vaporize” 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz “in such a way that there was no trace left of them.” No reputable historian now accepts either of these fanciful tales.

Tattoo Machines

Of all the multifarious “symbols of the holocaust” (and EVERYTHING about the holocaust is symbolic), probably no symbol is more powerful than the “holocaust tattoos” of the “holocaust survivors.” Wherever you find lying jews, you find “survivors;” wherever you find “survivors,” you find “holocaust tattoos.”

Excerpts from Edwin Black, IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s Most Powerful Corporation; long description of the complexity of the registration number system, which allegedly included a reference to the inmate’s occupation, in case the Germans needed certain skills:

“In August 1943, a timber merchant from Bendzin, Poland, arrived at Auschwitz. He was among a group of 400 inmates, mostly jews. First, a doctor examined him briefly to determine his fitness for work. His physical information was noted on a medical record. Second, his full prisoner registration was completed with all personal details. Third his name was checked against the indices of the Political Section to see if he would be subjected to special punishment. Finally, he was registered in the Labor Assignment Office and assigned a characteristic five-digit IBM Hollerith number, 44673. The five-digit Hollerith number was part of a custom punch card system devised by IBM to track prisoners in NAZI concentration camps, including the slave labor at Auschwitz. The Polish timber merchant’s punch card number would follow him from labor assignment to labor assignment as Hollerith systems tracked him and his availability for work, and reported it to the central inmate file eventually kept at Department DII. Department DII of the SS Economics Administration in Oranienburg oversaw all camp salve labor assignments, utilizing elaborate IBM systems. Later in the summer of 1943, the Polish timber merchant’s same five-digit Hollerith number, 44673, was tattooed on his forearm.”.

In other words, the alleged tattoo reference number was of such importance that the tattooing could not be entrusted to a mere inmate. In addition to which, the whole system could be frustrated by the inmates at any time, simply by re-tattooing each other and altering the numbers on the tattoos. The fact that tattoos can always be altered or covered would render any tattooing system useless for identification purposes. Since the holocaust tattoos we see are nearly always very crude, the alterations would be less noticeable, thus further defeating their alleged purpose.

You expect a tattoo to fade a bit, but this is very sloppy work, considering that the “tattoos” are alleged to have been of such crucial importance for identification and labour management purposes. Note as well that the location is not standardized: sometimes they appear on the inside of the arm, sometimes the outside. According to one yarn, the inmates were allowed to “choose” where they wanted their tattoos! Since any tattoo can be covered by another tattoo, the location must be absolutely standardized if the tattoo is to serve for the possible identification of escaped inmates: that way, any person with a tattoo in that location would be suspect. Failing to put the tattoo in the same place each time would render it even more useless than ever.

“The tattoos of the survivors have come to symbolize the utter brutality and of the concentration camps and the attempt of the NAZIS to dehumanize their victims. The tattoos are also a testament to the resilience of those who bear them. Yet despite the importance of the tattoos, as testament, symbol and historical artifact, little scholarship has been devoted to the subject. There exist virtually no official period documents relating to the practice; what we know stems from anecdotal evidence contained in camp records and the accounts of those who were at the camps.”.

In other words, there is no evidence that it ever happened, except for the tens of thousands of “survivors” displaying their “holocaust tattoos”, 55 years after the war. There are no documents, no tattooing equipment, nothing.

“As the number of prisoners brought to the expanding Auschwitz complex rose, so did the death rate. But if a corpse were separated from its uniform, identification was rendered all but impossible”.

If the Germans were busy murdering people by the millions, why the hell would they care about identifying them afterwards?

“After a month’s work the commission had singled out approximately 300 “fanatic communists”. [footnote 3: Danuta Czech, Auschwitz Chronicle 1939-1945, Henry Holt & Co., NY, 1990, p. 102]. Those designated as such were tattooed by means of a metal plate [!] with interchangeable needles attached to it [!] The plate was impressed into the flesh on the left side of their chests [!] and the dye was rubbed into the wound”.

Another source for this fantastic yarn is Tadeusz Iwaszko, La deportazione al campo e la registrazione dei prigionieri, in: “Auschwitz. Il campo nazista della morte” [“Deportation to the Camp and Registration of the Prisoners”, in: “Auschwitz: The Nazi Death Camp”, by F. Piper and T. Swiebocka, Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Publications, 1997, p. 54. The most amusing part (about how the machine proved “impractical” – like the height-measuring head-shot contraptions and other bizarre contraptions described by “survivors”) is usually deleted. Actually the whole passage is more or less a quotation from the “affidavit” of Tadeusz Iwaszko, naturally prepared following the Communist takeover of Poland. Remember, these are the same people who gave us the “quicklime trains”, “electrical chambers at Belzec” and the “steam chambers” and “vacuum chambers” at Treblinka. According to “Tadeusz Iwaszko” (whoever he was), the “interchangeable needles” were 1 cm long, 10 times the depth of an ordinary tattoo. In addition to causing a puncture wound, this would cause the ink to migrate beyond the intended location, blurring the tattoo, and, to some extent, defeating its intended purpose – legibility. Iwaszko’s affidavit reads, in part, as follows:

“A special metal stamp was employed, upon which the interchangeable figures were fixed, made up of needles approximately 1 cm long. By means of a heavy pressure of the stamp on the upper left part of the trunk, a tattoo of the entire number was obtained in one single motion by means of the intermixture of ink into the wound in the form of the numbers caused in this manner… [Deletion] Since use of the metal stamp proved rather impractical…”.

In other words, the Germans are alleged to have used a sort of stencil formed of needles, which could then be transformed at will into a stencil for any other number. The “metal plate” would probably require at least one hundred needles (see below) as well as an extremely complex mechanism permitting the formation of a different stencil for each five-digit number (i.e., needle 1 in position A1 would be moved laterally by a lever mechanism to position A9, for example), and so on for 100 needles, and, presumably, 100 levers (or perhaps it was computerized).

All to save a few minutes tattoo work with one needle! Where are the plans, designs, specification sheets, patents, order forms, manufacturing reports, provisional and final acceptance forms, delivery vouchers, inventory reports, etc. for this Rube Goldberg device? No such “metal plate” has ever been found. No documents relating to it have ever been found. No tattooing needles or other equipment has ever been found. In practice, such a “plate” would probably cause a puncture wound followed by anaerobic infection, in addition to infecting the entire camp with hepatitis, syphilis, staph infections, possible septicaemia and even gangrene. And if the “plate” was to be autoclaved after each inmate, how many thousands of “metal plates” would they need? Where did they all disappear to? Either the needles were interchanged in position only, or new needles were inserted from the back. Which is it?


For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves.

“Treblinka near Warsaw. The extermination camp for Jews. There was a chamber with moving knives, it was in a basement, under a banya. The bodies were cut into pieces and then burned. There were mountains of ashes, twenty to twenty-five metres high. In one place, Jews had been chased into a pond full of acid. Their screams were so terrible that local peasants abandoned their homes”.

According to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (1997), for example, “a total of 870,000 people” were killed and buried at Treblinka between July 1942 and April 1943. Then, between April and July 1943, the hundreds of thousands of corpses were allegedly dug up and burned in batches of 2,000 or 2,500 on large grids made of railway ties. Krege's team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archaeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.

Richard Krege geo-surverying Trelinka
Richard Krege geo-surverying Trelinka
Richard Krege geo-surverying Trelinka

“From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site, [..] We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether.”.

The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged “mass graves” portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.

“Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed,” he says. “Personally, I don't think there was an extermination camp there at all.”.

The study debunks Zionist British Archaeologist Caroline Sturdy-Colls’ fraudulent “investigation” of Treblinka, which included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new “hidden mass graves,” falsely assigning homicidal intent to a normal life-saving (halt spread of typhus by removing body lice with water) shower room at Majdanek, and misidentifying a terra-cotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.”

Krege and his team are associated with, and funded by, the Adelaide Institute. The institute's director, Dr. Fredrick Töben, was previously jailed in Germany for seven months in 1999 for disputing Holocaust extermination claims.


“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a US War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there, and erroneously described as a gas chamber, was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate, since the Russians would not permit it. The old propaganda myth that millions of Jews were killed by the National Socialists. From what I was able to… determine during six years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”.

“Neither in Dachau, nor in Bergen-Belsen, nor in Buchenwald were jews or other prisoners gassed”.


For a detailed historical account of Buchenwald read: Buchenwald: Legend and Reality

“Later, Mr Hubert was sent to Buchenwald “In the camp there was a cage with a bear and an eagle”. The bear would tear him apart and the eagle would pick at his bones.” “But that's unbelievable” whispered a visitor” “It is unbelievable” said Mr Hubert, “but it happened”.

Human Skin Lampshade and Handbag

After the extermination of National Socialist Germany, claims circulated that Ilse Koch, wife of the commandant of Buchenwald internment camp, not only had possessed lampshades made of human skin, but had specifically tattooed prisoners killed to use their skin for this purpose.

Propaganda Table
Overturned Propaganda Table displaying Shrunken Heads, Goat Skin Lampshade and Tattooed Skin

After her conviction for war crimes, General Lucius D. Clay, the interim military governor of the American Zone in Germany, reduced her sentence to four years' prison on the grounds “there was no convincing evidence that she had selected 'NAZI concentration' camp inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins, or that she possessed any articles made of human skin”.

Llse-koch devoted mother
Llse-koch wife of camp commander and devoted mother
Trial of Llse-koch
Koch on trial for alleged war crimes (including human skin lampshade)

Jean Edward Smith in his biography, Lucius D. Clay, an American Life, reported that the general had maintained that the leather lamp shades were really made out of goat skin.

The book quotes a statement made by General Clay years later:

“There was absolutely no evidence in the trial transcript, other than she was a rather loathsome creature, that would support the death sentence. I suppose I received more abuse for that than for anything else I did in Germany. Some reporter had called her the “Bitch of Buchenwald”, had written that she had lamp shades made of human skin in her house. And that was introduced in court, where it was absolutely proven that the lamp shades were made out of goat skin.”.

False statements made under oath by Dr. Gustav Wegerer, Austrian, political prisoner, kapo of the infirmary, and Josef Ackermann, a political prisoner and secretary of the camp doctor Waldemar Hoven wrongfully alleged that…

Despite the allegations being proven false, a systematic echo, reverberation of these false allegations were directed and broadcast to subdued and suggestable nations throughout the last fifty years via a medium of popularised culture, most notably originating and projected via Jewish influenced and dominated entertainment industry.

Word became flesh

Edward Theodore “Ed” Gein was a killer and body snatcher, active in the 1950s, who made trophies from corpses he stole from a local graveyard. When he was finally arrested in November 1957, a search of the premises revealed, among other disturbing artefacts, a lampshade made out of human skin. Gein appears to have been influenced by the then-current stories about the Nazis collecting body parts in order to make lampshades and other items.

Jewish Soap

The propaganda of “Jewish soap” to place during and after WW2 to smokescreen the fact that no mass burial evidence of millions of bodies of alleged Holocaust victims was found anywhere within Germany's borders or even in WW2 German-controlled and occupied territories. I would find it bizarre that National Socialist Germans would want, let alone endeavour to turn Jews into soap bars in hindsight of suffering social engineered anti-White decimations and persecutions of Jewish instigated Communist uprising during the Weimar Republic, why the hell would they want to wash in or make clean an insurgency that they knew to be decimating filth, a scourge upon their homeland? Hitler initially wanted to deport Jews to Madagascar, among many other countries that refused to accept them. It seems Hitlers only other foreseeable option was to try to reeducate and reform (Arbeit macht frei) Jews through GULAG, an honest and meaningful, hard day's work.

Nevertheless, this accusation was “proved” at the main Nuremberg show trial of 1945-1946, and has been authoritatively endorsed by numerous historians in the decades since. In recent years, though, as part of a broad retreat from the most obviously untenable aspects of the “orthodox” extermination story, Holocaust historians have grudgingly conceded that the human soap tale is a wartime propaganda lie. In their retreat, though, these historians have tried to dismiss the soap story as a mere wartime “rumour,” neglecting to mention that international Jewish organizations and then Allied governments endorsed and sanctioned this libellous canard the soap story became an important feature of Jewish and Allied war propaganda. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, wartime head of both the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress, publicly charged in November 1942 that Jewish corpses were being “processed into such war-vital commodities as soap, fats, and fertilizer” by the Germans. He further announced that the Germans were “even exhuming the dead for the value of the corpses,” and were paying fifty marks for each body.

“I have held in my hand a cake of soap stamped with the legend 'pure Jewish soap', prepared from the corpses of people who had been destroyed. But there is no need to speak of these things: thousands of books have been written about them.”.

During June and July 1943, two prominent representatives of the Moscow-based “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” toured the United States and raised more than two million dollars for the Soviet war effort at a series of mass meetings. At each of these rallies, Soviet Jewish leader Solomon Mikhoels showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses.

After the war, the soap story was given important legitimacy at the main Nuremberg trial. L. N. Smirnov, Chief Counsellor of Justice for the USSR, declared to the Tribunal:

“… The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods of complete annihilation of human bodies, which would not only conceal the traces of their crimes, but also to serve in the manufacturing of certain products. In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out.”.

It is worth emphasizing here that the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg Tribunal for the bogus soap story was no less substantial than the “evidence” presented for the claims of mass extermination in “gas chambers.”.

After the war, supposed Holocaust victims were solemnly buried, in the form of soap bars, in Jewish cemeteries. In 1948, for example, four such bars wrapped in a funeral shroud were ceremoniously buried according to Jewish religious ritual at the Haifa cemetery in Israel. Other bars of “Jewish soap” has been displayed as grim Holocaust relics at the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw, the Stutthof Museum near Gdansk (Danzig), the Yivo Institute in New York, the Holocaust Museum in Philadelphia, the Jewish Holocaust Centre in Melbourne (Australia), and at various locations in Israel.


Simon Wiesenthal’s Faked “Memoirs”

One of the world’s most famous holocaust “survivors” was the “Austrian” Jew, Simon Wiesenthal. He claimed to have been interned at the Mauthausen camp and, after the war, devoted his life to hunting ex-NAZIS. Wiesenthal had an organization (which is still in existence), devoted to Jewish interests and promoting the Jewish mass extermination legend, named after him.

Yet, it is a little known fact that Wiesenthal’s own personal holocaust memoirs, entitled KZ Mauthausen, Bild und Wort (“Concentration Camp Mauthausen, Pictures and Words”), published in 1946, contains one of the most blatant forgeries of all holocaust memoirs.

Wiesenthal illustrated his book with drawings which he allegedly did either while in Mauthausen or from memory thereafter. One of the more famous pictures from his book is of three Jews, in their striped prisoner outfits, who had been shot at the stake by the NAZIS.

Although Wiesenthal alleged in his book that the drawing of the three shot Jews occurred in Mauthausen, the pictures were in reality plagiarized from a series of photographs which appeared in Life magazine of June 11, 1945. The series of photographs were of German soldiers, captured during the “Battle of the Bulge” wearing American uniforms, and executed by firing squad.

Wiesenthal copied his picture of “three shot Jews” from this Life photo essay, as can be seen in the illustrations below.

Wiesenthal Lies
The title page of “NAZI hunter” and “holocaust survivor” Simon Wiesenthal’s memoirs, KZ Mauthausen: Bild und Wort (Concentration Camp Mauthausen: Pictures and Words, Vienna, 1946) and an illustration in the book, drawn by Wiesenthal with his signature at the bottom. The illustration purports to be the shooting of three jews Wiesenthal “witnessed” while imprisoned in the camp.
Wiesenthal Lies
Life magazine of June 11, 1945, carried a series of photographs of the unwarranted execution of German special forces soldiers caught wearing American uniforms behind Judea Allied lines during the Battle of the Bulge in December 1944. Wiesenthal took the images of the executed Germans, and redrew them as “executed Jews” in Mauthausen.
Wiesenthal Lies
Photographic story in Life magazine showing the shooting of the three Germans.
Wiesenthal Lies
Final three photographs, laid outside by side.
Wiesenthal Lies
these three images next to Wiesenthal’s “Mauthausen execution” drawing. There is no doubt as to where this “world-acclaimed NAZI hunter” stole this image for his “memoirs.”

The Anne Frank Diaries

It is alleged that Anne Frank, a German / Dutch and Jewish thirteen-year-old during WW2 kept a diary of her life and times during the year of August 1942 through to 1944, she had received as a birthday present, and it is claimed she wrote detail statements in the diary regularly.

Trial of Llse-koch
Left: handwriting of Anne Frank was published on the front page of Life magazine on August 18, 1958, along with a photograph she had taken of herself. The childish scrawl is in marked contrast to the adult’s handwriting of large parts of the diary, as illustrated on the right. (Picture of the front of the Anne Frank School in Amsterdam, where the building facade contains a copy of a page from the diary, ending with the signature “Anne M Frank.”.

“The question of the authenticity of the diary is not considered important enough to examine here; I will only remark that I have looked it over and don't believe it. For example, already on page 2 one is reading an essay on why a 13-year-old girl would start a diary, and then page 3 gives a short history of the Frank family and then quickly reviews the specific anti-Jewish measures that followed the German occupation in 1940. The rest of the book is in the same historical spirit.”.

There has been much speculation as to both the authenticity and to the legibility of the diary, the first allegation alleged the diary as being written with a ball point pen (more commonly known as the Biro). Debuting at Gimbels department store in New York City on 29 October 1945 the Biro was a popular and commonly used product but did not fully enter into retail circulation until at least 1952 (long after the war had ended).

Ann Frankenstien Diary
Ann Frankenstien Diary

“The Diary of Anne Frank may be a fraud. It was sold as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it could not possibly have been the work of a teenager.”.

The second allegation is that the diary was largely the inspirational work of her father, Otto Franks. When the diary copyright expired (extends only 70 years after the author’s death) in 2015 the Anne Frank Fonds (the foundation responsible for the diary) decided to try to extend copyright on the book by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.

Jew York Times article
The New York Times article in which the fraud was revealed.

“Annelies Marie Frank never kept a diary. What she called her 'diary' was a collection of sketches, fictional stories and fantasy letters to the eight members of her imaginary “club.” In 1944, she rewrote the lot, calling it a novel (“een roman”), but this was translated in the Diary to “a romance.” Otto Frank lied when he insisted he had not intended to publish it. First published in 1998, this is the most rigorous debunking of the Anne Frank Diary ever published, and revised in 2001 to include some recent developments in this ongoing saga.”.

Propped up and beautified, the same as all the other fictitious Holohoax stories, there is an Anne Frank statue and a school named after her in Amsterdam and an Anne Franks Centre in New York. In 1999, Time named Anne Frank among the heroes and icons of the 20th century on their list of The Most Important People of the Century, stating: “With a diary kept in a secret attic, she braved the Nazis and lent a searing voice to the fight for human dignity”.

“I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the Holocaust…I see no hint of anti-Semitic implications in [Robert] Faurisson's work”.

Over the years, several films about Anne Frank appeared. The diary has influenced a diverse group of artists and social commentators to make reference to her in literature, popular music, television, and other media.